Which of the following is NOT a possible punishment under a Non-Discrimination Policy 132a?

• A. The employee's compensation shall be increased by 1/2
• B. The employee's compensation shall be increased by 1/2 but not past $10,000
• C. Shall be entitled to reinstatement
• D. Reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits caused by the discrimination

Answer: (A)

The option stating that an employee's compensation shall be increased by 1/2 is not a possible punishment under a Non-Discrimination Policy 132a because non-discrimination policies are designed to prevent bias and ensure fair treatment in the workplace. Typically, such policies outline remedies aimed at addressing discrimination and its effects rather than simply increasing an employee's pay.

Correct remedies under discrimination policies often include reinstatement of the employee, reimbursement for lost wages, and other compensatory methods that align with the harm caused by discriminatory practices. In contrast, increasing compensation by a flat percentage does not inherently address the specific grievances of unfair treatment, nor does it reflect the nuanced limitations that might be placed on compensation adjustments as seen in the other options.

In summary, while compensation adjustments can be part of a remedy framework, the way in which they are structured under a non-discrimination policy needs to focus on rectifying inequities rather than providing arbitrary increases that lack context or justification.