What is the civil penalty for an employer forcing injured workers to accept less money than they are due?

• A. No civil penalty because of the exclusive remedy rule
• B. Civil penalty of up to $100
• C. Civil penalty of up to $500
• D. Civil penalty of up to $100,000

Answer: (D)

In the context of workers' compensation law, the civil penalty for an employer that coerces injured workers into accepting less compensation than they are entitled to can be significant. The rationale for such a high penalty, up to $100,000, is rooted in the legal framework that aims to protect vulnerable employees from exploitation.

This substantial penalty serves multiple purposes. First, it acts as a deterrent against employers who might consider taking advantage of injured workers, ensuring that they adhere to established laws regarding fair compensation. Second, it acknowledges the seriousness of such actions, as coercing workers undermines the integrity of the worker's compensation system designed to support employees who have sustained injuries on the job.

The exclusive remedy rule offers a legal framework that limits the options workers have in pursuing compensation for workplace injuries, usually confining them to the workers' compensation system. However, this does not absolve employers from the responsibility to provide the full compensation that injured workers are entitled to. Any attempt by an employer to manipulate or force a reduction in benefits is thus met with stringent penalties to uphold the law and protect workers' rights.

By setting a high penalty, the legal system emphasizes that such misconduct is taken seriously and ensures that employers are effectively held accountable for their actions.